ICP Modeling Guide
Build a tiered Ideal Customer Profile from your own closed-won and closed-lost data, then turn it into targeting criteria your outbound can actually filter on.
What problem does this solve?
Most companies define their ideal customer from memory and optimism, then spend a year discovering the list does not convert. This framework derives your ICP from the deals you actually won and lost, then turns it into tiered targeting criteria your outbound can filter on.
Business outcome
- Know exactly which accounts are worth outreach
- Stop spending budget on accounts that never close
- Give every rep the same definition of a good lead
- Cut research time before a list is built
- Turn win/loss history into a targeting asset
Start here. Almost every other workflow depends on this being defined.
Founder input is required — this encodes their judgment.
How the system fits together
Hover a node for detail, or tap a tool below to see where it runs.
Replicated from the ICP Modelling Playbook. Step order, tier criteria, and tool choices preserved from the source; presentation and verification checkpoints are ScaleMatic additions.
Most teams define their ICP from memory and optimism. The result is a list that looks reasonable and converts terribly — because it was never derived from which deals actually closed, and which ones quietly wasted six months.
- A three-tier ICP derived from real closed-won and closed-lost patterns
- Negative indicators that exclude accounts before you waste outreach on them
- An "Ideal 150" account list your outbound can start on immediately
- Founders running outbound
- RevOps leads
- Agencies building target lists
7 steps, start to finish
Copy-ready prompts
Tuned for Claude, GPT, Gemini, and Grok. Copy and run.
You are a revenue analyst. Below is a dataset of closed-won and closed-lost accounts with firmographic, technographic, and behavioral enrichment. Identify: (1) traits shared across wins, (2) traits shared across losses, (3) negative indicators that should disqualify an account outright, (4) the 5 attributes most predictive of a win. Return a tiering recommendation with explicit thresholds.
Common questions
Related resources
Build it yourself, or have it installed
The documentation above is complete — everything you need is on this page. The only question is whether you want to spend the time.
Free · 1–2 days
Done with your team
We diagnose the constraint first — if this system isn’t what you need, we’ll say so.